On 8 January 2014 11:06, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> If the universe reached a maximum and started to contract (which now seems
> unlikely) the maximum possible entropy would still be much higher than the
> actual entropy so entropy would continue to increase until the contracted
> enough to reduce the maximum to near the actual. If it were the reverse of
> the Big Bang it would be a very sudden contraction, aka "deflation". Of
> course it might actually be symmetric. Lawrence Schulman has a nice book
> about this "Times Arrow and Quantum Measurement". He did some computer
> simulations by just considering randomized initial conditions and then
> post-selecting the ones that satisfied the final conditions.
We actually don't know what would happen in a "bouncing universe", or even
if such a thing is physically possible. Certainly my mental image is that
entropy would continue to increase, at least until it was approaching the
Big Crunch, which would itself look something like a Big Bang in reverse
(but with black holes thrown in). But if the BC acts as a boundary
condition on the universe, as the BB appears to do, then that
*could*constrain matter to follow an opposite arrow of time, no matter
anti-intuitive that seems - or there could be a gradual switch over from
one arrow to another. Actually I once tried to write a story to this
effect, with dark stars sucking in light and time-reversed aliens trying to
flip their entropy gradient so they could avoid their BC, aka our BB. But I
couldn't make it work very well, and gave up...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.