On the contrary, I replied with a question that went unanswered. It was a question about whether a human baby, fed a stream of virtual sense data as in the movie The Matrix, could be considered conscious in your theory, as you seemed to suggest that consciousness was a property of reality, as a function somehow of "ontological energy".
Terren On Jan 8, 2014 1:49 PM, "Edgar L. Owen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Telmo, > > Thanks for the link but see my new topic "A theory of consciousness" of a > few days ago which no one has even commented on and which is much more > reasonable and explanatory. > > Edgar > > > > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 12:57:37 PM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote: >> >> In case you haven't seen it... >> >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.1219 >> >> Seems like an attempt to recover materialism, which strikes me as >> somewhat unexpected from Tegmark. Am I missing something? >> >> Cheers, >> Telmo. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
