Dear Bruno,

On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:51:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:17, Alberto G. Corona wrote: 
>
> > Computation is understood as whatever made by a digital computer or 
> > something that can be emulated (or aproximated) by a digital computer. 
>
> OK. That's a good definition, and it is correct if ... we assume   
> Church's thesis. 
>
>
>
> > So everything is a computation. 
>
> Goddam! Why. Even just about what is true in arithmetic cannot be   
> emulated by any computer. 
>
> I am afraid you might not really grasp what a computer is,   
> conceptually. See my answer to stephen yesterday, which shows wahy   
> Church thesis entails that most attribute of *machines* cannot be   
> computed by a machine. 
>
> Or think about Cantor theorem. The set of functions from N top N is   
> not enumerable, yet the set of *computable* functions is enumerable. 
>

That is a theorem that takes certain axioms as true... We can build 
theories with other axioms... I wish to escape the prison of the Tennenbaum 
Theorem!
 

>
>
>
>
> > That is a useless definition. because 
> > it embrace everything. 
>
> For a mathematician, the computable is only a very tiny part of the   
> truth. 
>
>
>
>
> > 
> > Everything is legoland because everything can be emulated using lego 
> > pieces? No, my dear legologist. 
>
> Not veything can be emulated by a computer. few things actually in   
> usual math. Some constructivist reduces math so that everything   
> becomes computable, but even there, few agree. 
> In Brouwer intuitionist analysis he uses the axiom "all function are   
> continuous" or "all functions are computable", but this is very   
> special approach, and not well suited to study computationalism (which   
> becomes trivial somehow there). 
>
>
> > 
> > What about this definition? Computation is whatever that reduces 
> > entropy. 
>
> It will not work, because all computation can be done in a way which   
> does not change the entropy at all. See Landauer, Zurek, etc. 
>
> Only erasing information change entropy, and you don't need to erase   
> information to compute. 
>
>
>
> > In information terms, in the human context, computation is 
> > whatever that reduces uncertainty producing useful information and 
> > thus, in the environment of human society, a computer program is used 
> > ultimately to get that information and reduce entropy, that is to 
> > increase order in society, or at least for the human that uses it. 
>
> The UD generates uncertainty (from inside). 
>
>
> > 
> > A simulation is an special case of the latter. 
> > 
> > So there are things that are computations: what the living beings do 
> > at the chemical, physiological or nervous levels (and rational, social 
> > and technological level in case of humans) . But there are things that 
> > are not computations: almost everything else. 
>
> That is the case with the definition you started above, and which is   
> the one used by theoretical computer scientist. 
>
> Bruno 
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ 
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to