On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Einstein illustrates that you can believe in a non personal God. > So you believe this non personal thing that has no purpose or goal and can not be understood as having any attribute as anthropomorphic as intelligence or consciousness and that has absolutely nothing to do with morality should nevertheless be called "God" because it adds to clarity. Bruno, please explain to me why this would be a wise use of language. > Comp reduces that mystery to another one, > Well good for "comp". > Read the Plotinus paper. > No thanks, I'm sick to death of ancestor worship. > You seem to take the Aristotelian (naturalist, materialist, physicalist) > theology for granted. > I've said more than once that Aristotle was the worst physicist who ever lived, he certainly caused the most damage to the field. > You confirm my feeling that people who pretend to dislike religion are > those who have a religion, > Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12. > The fact that you ignore that you are religious, and indeed christian (in > absolute value) will not help you for making you one epsilon less > "christian". > Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
