On 2/4/2014 3:25 PM, LizR wrote:
..
Well, we don't know if /anything/ is really real. I wasn't intending to discuss
metaphysics on this thread; if you want to do that, maybe you could start another one. All
I'm arguing is that SR (and to some extent NM) imply a block universe as the simplest
explanatory framework (via the usual application of Occam), plus throw in a few points
about the circularity of competing explanations. If that's wrong then I will go out into
the garden and eat worms, but I don't think that anything you're saying actual conflicts
with that.... as far as I can tell. But then I'm not sure what point you're trying to
make, unless you're just to take apart everything I say in order to make me look and feel
stupid (which, you know, I can do quite well myself).
My apologies. That was not my intent at all and you are obviously a very smart person.
But I think we are talking metaphysics - at least Bruno is. His theory is pretty 'meta'
relative to physics.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
