On 11 February 2014 13:42, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/10/2014 1:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 06:08, meekerdb wrote: > > On 2/9/2014 12:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Even on his argument, that nobody understand but him, against step 3? Then > I invite you to attempt to explain it to us. > > > > I think I understand it. Asking the question "which will you be" in the > MW experiment is ambiguous because "you" is duplicated. > > > But that question is John Clark's invention. I never ask it. The > question asked is about your FIRST PERSON expectation about 1-your future. > It cannot be ambiguous when we assume comp. > > Sure it is. What does "your first person expectation" refer to. Does it > ask what will your 1-p experience be? Or does it ask what is your 1-p > feeling about where you will be? >
Consider a quantum measurement instead. Do we have an expectation of 1p experience when we check if a photon's been reflected or transmitted? We assign a probability to each outcome, surely? Why is Bruno's duplicator different? (We seem to have been around in a loop on this about 100 times...) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
