On 12 February 2014 13:50, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 07:46:48AM +1300, LizR wrote:
> > On 12 February 2014 02:55, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > My problem with this is that I don't believe in arithmetical realism in
> > > the sense required for this argument.  I think consciousness depends of
> > > consciousness *of* an external world and thoughts just about Peano's
> > > arithmetic is not enough to realize consciousness and the
> > > "ineffable=unprovable" identification is gratuitous.  There are obvious
> > > physical and evolutionary reasons that qualia would be ineffable.
>  That's
> > > why I think step 8 is invalid because it assumes dreams (of
> arithmetic?)
> > > are possible independent of any external world - or looked at another
> way,
> > > I think to make it work would require that the 'inert' computation
> simulate
> > > a whole world in which the consciousness would then exist *relative* to
> > > that world.
> > >
> >
> > Well, you have already rejected step 0 - (at least one of) the initial
> > assumptions - so I wouldn't worry about step 8!
> >
>
> I don't see how it rejects step 0. Provided that the artificial
> computational brain offered by the doctor is connected to the actual
> senses, and not just placed in a vat connected to some simulated
> reality, it certainly satisfies the Yes Doctor postulate.
>
> I don't see the relevance of AR or CT to Brent's argument.
>
> Well, Brent seems to think it does (it was the AR bit he was rejecting, or
the Peano subset thereof I think?).

However, I agree that "I think consciousness depends of (sic) consciousness
*of* an external world" is simply an opinion, and the other related
objections seem to be "arguing from incredulity".

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to