On 12 February 2014 14:02, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:24PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > You are right, the qualia are in X1* \ X1, like we get quanta in > > S4Grz1, Z1*, X1*. > > The only thing you can say is that qualia ought to obey the axioms of > X1*\X1, (and even that supposes that Z captures all observations, > which I think is debatable), not that your model generates qualia, as > Liz was suggesting. > > There may well be other things in X1*\X1 that are not qualia. > > This is not a critique of you - I don't recall you ever claiming your > model "got qualia", I was mainly responding to Liz's comment of 11/2/14. > My unreserved apologies if I misrepresented Bruno. I was under the impression that comp has at least some sort of claim to explain qualia, but since I haven't got that far in the argument I wasn't able to say any more than I did. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
