On 2/17/2014 10:25 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:



2014-02-18 3:35 GMT+01:00 meekerdb <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>:

    On 2/17/2014 5:57 PM, David Nyman wrote:
    On 17 February 2014 20:15, meekerdb <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        But it is unambiguous under comp ex hypothesi: i.e. any classically 
adequate
        copy of me is equivalent to me. Under this hypothesis if I am 
duplicated both
        the resulting continuations are equivalent immediately posterior to
        duplication. Consequently I repeat my question: if *you* were 
duplicated in
        this manner, would you reasonably expect that either of the resulting
        equivalent continuations would experience a two-valued outcome?

        No, but as I said, that's regarding them as third persons.


    Well, the very logic of the hypothesis dictates that *both* continuations 
inherit
    the first personal perspective of the original and this will always be
    single-valued. But, as you said, there is an ineliminable ambiguity because 
neither
    can record anything first-personal that incorporates that third-personal
    doubleness. IOW it always seems as if there is only one of me (1p) even in 
the case
    that I know there are two of me (3p). Do you agree that this ambiguity is
    sufficient for step 3 to go through?

    You sound as though you want to sell me something.  I have no interest 
buying the
    argument one piece at a time or swallowing it all at once.  I'm interested 
in
    understanding it and it's consequences.


It's seems to me that following the argument step by step is then the thing to do... and if you disagree with a step, explain why...

When an argument is a reductio you don't necessarily know which step to 
disagree with.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to