Stathis,

1. This disproves what it sets out to prove. It assumes a RUNNING computer 
which assumes a flowing time. This example can't be taken seriously. If 
anything it's a proof that time has to flow to give the appearance of time 
flowing, which is the correct understanding...


2. I assume in this context you don't mean 'multiverse' but 'many worlds' 
and that your use of 'multiverse' was a typo? 

If so I have some questions I like to ask to clarify how you understand 
MWI, particularly in the block universe context you previously mentioned.

Edgar

On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:06:49 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
>
> On 24 February 2014 07:57, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Stathis, 
> > 
> > If we assume time flows, as everyone in the universe other than block 
> time 
> > devotees do, the answers to all your questions are obvious. 
> > 
> > First of all my universe is NOT a "presentist" universe. Don't use 
> > misleading incorrect labels to describe it. 
> > 
> > If time flows, as it clearly does, then all movement follows 
> automatically. 
> > The flow of time is a fundamental assumption in my theory. Doesn't 
> matter if 
> > it flows continuously or in minute increments. The way my theory says it 
> > actually flows is in minute processor cycles in which the current state 
> of 
> > the universe is continually recomputed. This also corresponds to the 
> > continual extension of the radial dimension of a hyperspherical 
> universe. 
> > 
> > The current present moment is simply the current surface of that 
> > hypersphere, and the current processor cycle of p-time. It is not the 
> SAME 
> > present moment all the time because the present moment is just the 
> current 
> > moment of p-time. It does continually move along the radial p-time axis 
> of 
> > the universe. That's how the past continually transitions to the present 
> as 
> > the universe continually recomputes its current state. 
> > 
> > This is a simple elegant theory that is consistent with all of science, 
> and 
> > reflects the basic idea of science that time flows from the big bang to 
> the 
> > present moment of time. Everyone believes this with very few exceptions, 
> and 
> > everyone WITHOUT exception lives according to it. Even block universe 
> > believers live their entire lives as if time flows because that is the 
> only 
> > way they can possibly function. That's overwhelming evidence that time 
> does 
> > flow. 
> > 
> > Now, how does that work in a block universe? You didn't answer my 
> questions, 
> > you just asked the same questions back to me and I gave you the answers. 
> So 
> > now what are your answers please? 
>
> It can be shown that motion and the appearance of the flow of time can 
> survive a discontinuity. Imagine there is computer simulation with an 
> observer watching a moving object, such as ball thrown across his 
> field of vision. The computer goes through machine states M1,M2,M3,M4 
> corresponding (roughly) with subjective states in the observer 
> S1,S2,S3,S4. Now suppose at M2 the data is saved to disk, the program 
> stopped and the computer shut down. After a period, the computer is 
> rebooted, the program restarted and the saved data loaded. The 
> computer then goes through M3 and M4. Do you agree that the observer 
> cannot tell if the computer was shut down, or how long it was shut 
> down for? Do you agree that he has the same uninterrupted visual 
> experience S1,S2,S3,S4 of the ball flying through the air? 
>
> > And another question. What is the basic reason you think we need a block 
> > universe? What does it explain that the normal view of time flowing from 
> the 
> > big bang to the present doesn't explain? 
> > 
> > The block universe theory explains nothing that the ordinary scientific 
> view 
> > of the universe doesn't explain better and just adds all sorts of 
> > complications and convoluted explanations. So why come up with it in the 
> > first place? 
>
> I find the idea of a multiverse elegant and simple, and despite what 
> you say I think it is consistent with observation. 
>
>
> -- 
> Stathis Papaioannou 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to