Quentin,

The pitiful thing is that you don't understand that is a true statement 
exactly as stated. It's a comment on definitions of terminology another 
poster was using, rather than actual theory.

Keep trying my friend, but if that is the best you can do it will take a 
very long time!

Edgar



On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:43:20 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> For your pleasure, just a little quote from yourself:
>
> "If as you say, the ""same point in time" in relativity just MEANS that 
> two events are assigned the same time coordinate" then the twins are NOT 
> at the same point in time because the two events of their meeting have 
> different time coordinates in their coordinate systems."
>
> if someone need a proof you don't understand s..t.
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 18:39 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]<javascript:>
> >:
>
> ahahah
>
>
> 2014-02-24 18:36 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
> Quentin,
>
> I challenge you to show me a single inconsistency between P-time and 
> relativity. There aren't any that I'm aware of even though Jesse has tried 
> repeatedly he is still trying to prove the very first one (by his own 
> admission) and hasn't succeeded so far....
>
> You can't just state an uniformed opinion and expect anyone to believe 
> it....
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:19:57 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> Plenty of people have already demonstrated the inconsistency of your view 
> of p-time and simultaneity... you just ignore it and play dumb. You still 
> haven't grasped what it means to be at the same spacetime coordinate... 
>
> Quentin
>
>
> 2014-02-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>:
>
> Ghibbsa,
>
> Nevertheless people keep accusing P-time of being inconsistent with 
> relativity when it isn't and no one has been able to demonstrate any way 
> that it is.
>
> Edgar
>
>
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:48:09 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:41:17 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> Ghibbsa,
>
> To address one of your points.
>
> My P-time theory starts by accepting EVERY part of relativity theory and 
> adding to it rather than trying to change any part of it. If my theory is 
> inconsistent with relativity in any respect I would consider my theory 
> falsified.
>
>  
> To be honest this wasn't one of my points. This has already come up and 
> been stated quite a few times. Feel free to try reading  but otherwise not 
> to worry. 
>  
>
> I'm not trying to replace relativity in any respect at all. I'm adding a 
> necessary interpretation and context to it, which it itself implicitly 
> assumes, though without stating that assumption.
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:48:54 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:12:05 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
>
> Ghibbsa,
>
> Well, first of all my theory doesn't tell nature what to do, it asks 
> nature what it does and attempts to explain it. All the issues you raise 
> are good ones, but when my theory is understood it greatly SIMPLIFIES 
> reality. It doesn't make it more complex as you claim. And in fact it 
> clarifies many points that relativity can't on its own, such as how the 
> twins can have different clock times and different real ages in an agreed 
> upon and empirically observable single present moment. Only p-time can 
> explain that.
>
> Relativity on its own just can't explain that... My theory makes it all 
> clear, and directly leads to the clarification of many other mysteries as 
> well, from cosmology to how spaceclocktime is created by quantum events. By 
> doing that it resolves quantum paradox, conceptually unifies GR and QT, and 
> explains the source of quantum randomn
>
> ...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to