Quentin, Even if that were true, and it's not, it doesn't even address your contention my theory is inconsistent with relativity, which remains unproved and simply an unfounded opinion on your part.
Perhaps you are trying to change the subject because you can't prove your original contention? That's fine, just man up and admit it... Edgar On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:59:10 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > Yes, you didn't know proper time and coordinate time, and now you're > mastering it... you're the best joke of the internet... you should open a > circus. > > Quentin > > > 2014-02-24 18:56 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > > Quentin, > > The pitiful thing is that you don't understand that is a true statement > exactly as stated. It's a comment on definitions of terminology another > poster was using, rather than actual theory. > > Keep trying my friend, but if that is the best you can do it will take a > very long time! > > Edgar > > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:43:20 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > For your pleasure, just a little quote from yourself: > > "If as you say, the ""same point in time" in relativity just MEANS that > two events are assigned the same time coordinate" then the twins are NOT > at the same point in time because the two events of their meeting have > different time coordinates in their coordinate systems." > > if someone need a proof you don't understand s..t. > > > > 2014-02-24 18:39 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]>: > > ahahah > > > 2014-02-24 18:36 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: > > Quentin, > > I challenge you to show me a single inconsistency between P-time and > relativity. There aren't any that I'm aware of even though Jesse has tried > repeatedly he is still trying to prove the very first one (by his own > admission) and hasn't succeeded so far.... > > You can't just state an uniformed opinion and expect anyone to believe > it.... > > Edgar > > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:19:57 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > Plenty of people have already demonstrated the inconsistency of your view > of p-time and simultaneity... you just ignore it and play dumb. You still > haven't grasped what it means to be at the same spacetime coordinate... > > Quentin > > > 2014-02-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: > > Ghibbsa, > > Nevertheless people keep accusing P-time of being inconsistent with > relativity when it isn't and no one has been able to demonstrate any way > that it is. > > Edgar > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:48:09 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:41:17 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > Ghibbsa, > > To address one of your points. > > My P-time theory starts by accepting EVERY part of relativity theory and > adding to it rather than trying to change any part of it. If my theory is > inconsistent with relativity in any respect I would consider my theory > falsified. > > > To be honest this wasn't one of my points. This has already come up and > been stated quite a few times. Feel free to try reading but otherwise not > to worry. > > > I'm not trying to replace relativity in any respect at all. I'm adding a > necessary interpretation and context to it, which it itself implicitly > assumes, though without stating that assumption. > > Edgar > > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:48:54 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:12:05 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen > wrote:<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px > 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(2 > > ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
