Yes, you didn't know proper time and coordinate time, and now you're mastering it... you're the best joke of the internet... you should open a circus.
Quentin 2014-02-24 18:56 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: > Quentin, > > The pitiful thing is that you don't understand that is a true statement > exactly as stated. It's a comment on definitions of terminology another > poster was using, rather than actual theory. > > Keep trying my friend, but if that is the best you can do it will take a > very long time! > > Edgar > > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:43:20 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> For your pleasure, just a little quote from yourself: >> >> "If as you say, the ""same point in time" in relativity just MEANS that >> two events are assigned the same time coordinate" then the twins are NOT >> at the same point in time because the two events of their meeting have >> different time coordinates in their coordinate systems." >> >> if someone need a proof you don't understand s..t. >> >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:39 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]>: >> >> ahahah >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:36 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: >> >> Quentin, >> >> I challenge you to show me a single inconsistency between P-time and >> relativity. There aren't any that I'm aware of even though Jesse has tried >> repeatedly he is still trying to prove the very first one (by his own >> admission) and hasn't succeeded so far.... >> >> You can't just state an uniformed opinion and expect anyone to believe >> it.... >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:19:57 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> Plenty of people have already demonstrated the inconsistency of your view >> of p-time and simultaneity... you just ignore it and play dumb. You still >> haven't grasped what it means to be at the same spacetime coordinate... >> >> Quentin >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> Nevertheless people keep accusing P-time of being inconsistent with >> relativity when it isn't and no one has been able to demonstrate any way >> that it is. >> >> Edgar >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:48:09 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:41:17 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> To address one of your points. >> >> My P-time theory starts by accepting EVERY part of relativity theory and >> adding to it rather than trying to change any part of it. If my theory is >> inconsistent with relativity in any respect I would consider my theory >> falsified. >> >> >> To be honest this wasn't one of my points. This has already come up and >> been stated quite a few times. Feel free to try reading but otherwise not >> to worry. >> >> >> I'm not trying to replace relativity in any respect at all. I'm adding a >> necessary interpretation and context to it, which it itself implicitly >> assumes, though without stating that assumption. >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:48:54 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:12:05 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> Well, first of all my theory doesn't tell nature what to do, it asks >> nature what it does and attempts to explain it. All the issues you raise >> are good ones, but when my theory is understood it greatly SIMPLIFIES >> reality. It doesn't make it more complex as you claim. And in fact it >> clarifies many points that relativity can't on its own, such as how the >> twins can have different clock times and different real ages in an agreed >> upon and empirically observable single present moment. Only p-time can >> explain that. >> >> Relativity on its own just can't explain that... My theory makes it all >> clear, and directly leads to the clarification of many other mysteries as >> well, from cosmology to how spaceclocktime is created by quantum events. By >> doing that it resolves quantum paradox, conceptually unifies GR and QT, and >> explains the source of quantum randomn >> >> ... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
