Just first, explain what p-time is supposed to solve in the first place that relativity doesn't. (if you come back again with the possibility for the twins to meet up, relativity doesn't need p-time for that, so you should find a real problem p-time solve that relativity alone can't).
Then answer the following: Is there an objective fact about the simultaneity of two distant event in p-time ? Yes/No Quentin 2014-02-24 19:11 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: > Quentin, > > Even if that were true, and it's not, it doesn't even address your > contention my theory is inconsistent with relativity, which remains > unproved and simply an unfounded opinion on your part. > > Perhaps you are trying to change the subject because you can't prove your > original contention? That's fine, just man up and admit it... > > Edgar > > > > On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:59:10 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> Yes, you didn't know proper time and coordinate time, and now you're >> mastering it... you're the best joke of the internet... you should open a >> circus. >> >> Quentin >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:56 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: >> >> Quentin, >> >> The pitiful thing is that you don't understand that is a true statement >> exactly as stated. It's a comment on definitions of terminology another >> poster was using, rather than actual theory. >> >> Keep trying my friend, but if that is the best you can do it will take a >> very long time! >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:43:20 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> For your pleasure, just a little quote from yourself: >> >> "If as you say, the ""same point in time" in relativity just MEANS that >> two events are assigned the same time coordinate" then the twins are NOT >> at the same point in time because the two events of their meeting have >> different time coordinates in their coordinate systems." >> >> if someone need a proof you don't understand s..t. >> >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:39 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]>: >> >> ahahah >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:36 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: >> >> Quentin, >> >> I challenge you to show me a single inconsistency between P-time and >> relativity. There aren't any that I'm aware of even though Jesse has tried >> repeatedly he is still trying to prove the very first one (by his own >> admission) and hasn't succeeded so far.... >> >> You can't just state an uniformed opinion and expect anyone to believe >> it.... >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:19:57 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> Plenty of people have already demonstrated the inconsistency of your view >> of p-time and simultaneity... you just ignore it and play dumb. You still >> haven't grasped what it means to be at the same spacetime coordinate... >> >> Quentin >> >> >> 2014-02-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> Nevertheless people keep accusing P-time of being inconsistent with >> relativity when it isn't and no one has been able to demonstrate any way >> that it is. >> >> Edgar >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 11:48:09 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:41:17 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Ghibbsa, >> >> To address one of your points. >> >> My P-time theory starts by accepting EVERY part of relativity theory and >> adding to it rather than trying to change any part of it. If my theory is >> inconsistent with relativity in any respect I would consider my theory >> falsified. >> >> >> To be honest this wasn't one of my points. This has already come up and >> been stated quite a few times. Feel free to try reading but otherwise not >> to worry. >> >> >> I'm not trying to replace relativity in any respect at all. I'm adding a >> necessary interpretation and context to it, which it itself implicitly >> assumes, though without stating that assumption. >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:48:54 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:12:05 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen >> wrote:<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border- >> left-color:rgb(2 >> >> ... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
