On 2 March 2014 20:28, Chris de Morsella <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>Yes, except I conceive of a virtuous circle of explanation...and reject > the idea that there is an base. > > An interesting view. Recently I have been toying with retro-causality as a > potential mechanism for self-manifestation without any need of ultimate > origin or any primal causation. > IMHO you need some sort of logical explanation. Otherwise retrocausality is like eternal inflation - you can use it to explain where the universe comes from, but you still need to explain the origin of the laws of physics that allow it to happen. (This is why I find Max Tegmark's mathematical universe stuff appealing.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
