On 04 Mar 2014, at 00:01, LizR wrote:
Jesse, much as I admire your attempt to engage with Edgar and his
theory, I suspect you will eventually have to accept that he isn't
arguing rationally - it looks to me as thought he will just pounce
on some word you use, and twist it around to try and make a case.
He is, in other words, a troll.
He certainly behave like a troll. If only by the way he does not
answer question. The list self-moderation principle is a bit sick
those days.
Bruno
On 4 March 2014 11:51, Jesse Mazer <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]>
wrote:
Jesse,
No, it was you that said there was NO correlation.
Jeez Edgar, you really need to work on your reading comprehension. I
just got through AGREEING that I had said that there wasn't a
correlation, but I explained that this was because I was using
"correlation" in the way YOU had consistently been using it up until
now, to refer to a 1:1 correlation in which each proper age of a
twin is matched up to one unique proper age of the other twin.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
