On 3/7/2014 8:26 PM, LizR wrote:
On 8 March 2014 08:14, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 3/7/2014 1:24 AM, LizR wrote:On 7 March 2014 18:29, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 3/6/2014 9:15 PM, Jason Resch wrote:A related question is, is there any such thing as true randomness at all? Or is every case of true randomness an instance of FPI?*Or is FPI just a convoluted way to pretend there isn't true randomness? * If one assumes QM and the MWI are correct then it isn't pretending,True; but I don't assume that.Since your original statement above only makes sense in some context - which you haven't revealed, as far as I can tell - perhaps you could tell us what you /are/ assuming?
I'm not assuming anything, I'm just pointing out that one could assume something different than QM and MWI. For instance, start with MWI but then suppose that at each "branching" only one instance of you continues. Doesn't that accord with all experience?
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
