The electron is not a point particle.
The tronnie is a point particle. Three tronnies make an electron. When two tronnies combine to make an entron, each tronnie is repelling itself and attracting each other with Couomb forces that depend on the diameter of their circle which is stable. If we integrate the Coluomb forces around the circumference of the circle the integrated force (newtons) becomes joules which is equivalent to mass. My guess is that when I do calculate Mercury’s precession with my theory, I will get an answer similar to Albert’s. His theory was that large masses curve space. I say space is nothing – it can’t be curved. Gravity is produced by high fluxes of neutrino photons which help create and travel in Coulomb grids which are definitely curved by large masses. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Clark Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 1:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TRONNIES On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > My theory describes the internal structure of electrons First explain why the internal structure of a point particle like a electron even needs explaining. > tronnies are always in their ground state. They each are a point of charge. > That is all they ever are. And then explain why the internal structure of a point particle like a "tronnie" does NOT need explaining. > They have no energy no mass. Then where does mass come from? > I don’t think I will be denied the Nobel prize because I haven’t explained > Mercury’s precession. I do. As soon as he finished General Relativity Einstein used his theory to calculate Mercury’s precession with just paper and pencil in about an hour, if your theory is really better than Einstein's then why can't you too? > No I haven’t done any math regarding perturbations. Why not? No physicist is going to take your theory seriously or even call it a theory if you can't calculate with it, if you can't get numbers out of it so it can be checked with observation. Why is the proton 1836 times as massive as the electron? Why is the neutron almost the same but not quite, why is it 1842 times as massive as the electron? Why do independent protons have a half life of an infinite number of minutes but independent neutrons have a half life of 10 minutes 11 seconds? If your theory can produce any of these numbers then you should book your flight to Stockholm and start writing your acceptance speech, but not until then. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
