On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: > > As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to segue > into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to show that > either his premises or his argument is wrong... >
I don't agree with you about that, but for point of order, I haven't gone down that road anyway. He's wrong about falsification. I did try to drop it. I shall probably try again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
