Some of you seem to think the relativity theories and the Standard Model are 
fact.  Last time I looked they were still regarded as theories.  I know  there 
is lots of evidence that support these theories.  There is just as much (maybe 
more) evidence to support my theory.  A lot has been learned in the past 100 
years that Albert Einstein was not aware of when he did his work.  So in that 
respect I have an advantage over him.

 

As a simple example Coulomb’s Law supports the most important feature of my 
theory.  Coulomb’s Law requires  that all charged particles must be point 
particles or made from point particles.  My theory explains that electrons and 
positrons are each comprised of three tronnies (two minus and one plus and two 
plus and one minus).  Tronnies have a charge of plus e or minus e.  Protons are 
comprised of eleven tronnies (six plus and five minus).   Photons are comprised 
of one entron which is comprised of two tronnies.  My theory provides a 
detailed description of pair production and electron-positron annihilation 
consistent with experimental evidence.

 

Your statement that my theory has been proven wrong several times is incorrect. 
 No portion of this version of my theory has ever been proven wrong.  If there 
were any portion of my theory that had been proven wrong, I assure you I would 
be making plans to fix it.  But I have seen no such proof.  This version is 
Version 8. There were lots of errors in versions 1-7 but they have all been 
corrected.  The basic feature that I started with is still correct, that is 
that protons comprised of electrons and positrons.  Do any of you believe that 
there are an equal number of electrons and positrons in our Universe?  Remember 
electrons and positrons are created in pairs and destroyed in pairs.  (Where 
are the missing positrons?)

 

I have also offered to send a free book to several of the people in this group, 
but only LizR has requested one.   

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: TRONNIES

 

 

 

2014-05-27 23:46 GMT+02:00 John Ross <[email protected]>:

Thank you, whoever it was that wrote the long paragraph.  It reminds me of the 
only lawyer joke that I can remember.  “Why do they bury Lawyers 8 feet deep.”  
“Because down deep they are not too bad.”

 

I did learn the Law of Sines and I re-learned it over the weekend.  My new 
knowledge has added support for my theory.  One of my genius friends is 
checking my math.  I will post the results when I get them.  

 

You are right.  I have been buggering along for 13 years and expect to continue 
doing so until I find something basically wrong with my theory

 

It already has been shown wrong several times... but you lack honesty and 
humility like all good crackpots... hence that will never happen (and *that's* 
a real honest and verifiable prediction).

 

Quentin

 

 

that I can’t fix or until I receive the Nobel prize.

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 9:46 AM


To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: TRONNIES

 

 

On Sunday, May 25, 2014 12:43:33 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:

On 25 May 2014 02:44, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

 

And you think rusty high school algebra is all you need to revolutionize 
physics and win a Nobel Prize. Does anyone around here STILL think John Ross is 
not a crackpot? 

 

Blessed are the cracked, for they let in the light.

 

(Unless they are mugs, for they let out the coffee...)

 

Sadly, having given Mr Ross lots of rope, I am coming to the conclusion that 
he's fashioned a very serviceable noose for himself.

 

You were *very* decent Lizzie...I had to read that post twice and felt it 
rather moving, when you said his idea might be crazy enough to have 
something...that it was elegant. I agree actually. And I think it's more than 
possible, and there are more than plenty of precedents, for someone being 
essentially wrong or ill-informed about a shed load of stuff, yet right about 
something that in the fullness of time turns out to be more significant than 
all of the stuff wrong and otherwise ill-informed when should not reasonably 
have been. Not saying that'll be our John Ross mind you...but I agreed or found 
agreeable something about the chap. Also, it's good to feel sure - unlike poor 
Edgar - that John Ross will not be put off at all by anything that has been 
said. He'll keep buggering on....for better or worse 3p sense. Of 
course...it'll likely be for nothing...but that is the price one pays for 
saying it's different. Of course he should have learned the law of sines, and 
the other stuff...and of course John Clarke gave a splendid and admirable 
showing and shall rightly be the star of the thread. But on the other 
hand.....if Ross had known all that maybe he'd never had had his insights. A 
double edged blade that one certainly...but let's not forget it is a two edged 
thing.,

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





 

-- 

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger 
Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to