I may have been a bit harsh on you for using "believe" - it's OK in general
discussions to mean something like "this is what I think is likely" but
becomes a more loaded term when used to indicate something more outrageous,
for example, that you don't think time dilation occurs. At that point it
starts to sound like the "argument from incredulity" - "I just can't
believe that such a weird thing could happen!" or words to that effect.
Which is an argument that modern science has discredited many times ("I
can't beleive the Earth orbits the Sun!" - "I can't believe humans
descended from apes!" - etc)I would recommend continuing to use it in the first, uncontentious sense, where it's merely a qualifier, but being more careful how you phrase things when you're making what most people consider a outrageous claim. On 29 May 2014 12:51, John Ross <jr...@trexenterprises.com> wrote: > There are an equal number of electrons and positrons in our Universe. > Each proton includes two positrons and only one electron. So the number of > electrons outside of protons is equal to the number of positrons outside of > protons plus half of the number of positrons inside protons. I think I did > that right. My point is that the missing positrons are the extra positrons > in the protons. > > > > You asked why aren’t there an equal number of positrons and > anti-protons. An anti-proton is comprised of two electrons plus a high > energy positron that has captured a neutrino entron with a mass of 1.65 X 10 > -27 kg, exactly opposite the proton. Therefore, each anti-proton created > removes two electrons but only one positron from the population of > electrons and positrons . So there may be an equal number of positrons and > anti-protons. This is a very good question. I’ll have to think about it > some more. > That is indeed the $64,000 question! > > > What I am fairly certain of (I would normally say “believe”) is that the > number of electrons and positrons in our Universe is equal, but some of > each are contained in protons and anti-protons. The number of plus and > minus tronnies in our Universe is also equal. The number of protons and > anti-protons are not equal. > Yes, which is what I was hoping you'd be able to explain - if you can, that will (I believe :-) put you one up on existing theories. > > > In Black Holes there is a relatively large number of free positrons and a > large number of neutrino entrons due to the destruction of protons in the > Black Holes. There is also a large number of free electrons. Therefore in > Black Holes you have all you need to make anti-protons, So large numbers > of anti-protons are made in Black Holes. So after they are made, they > combine with a proton and both the proton and the anti-proton are destroyed > releasing all of the electrons and positrons in both particles. Two > neutrino entrons are also released. Most of these neutrino entrons are > released from the Black Hole to produce the gravity of its galaxy. Some > combine with electrons and positrons to produce either protons or > anti-protons. Each anti-proton produced will result in the destruction of > another proton and anti-proton. I calculate that if the Black Hole in the > center of the Milky Way galaxy consumes the equivalent of an earth-size > planet per day the resulting neutrino photon flux at our earth would be > about 68,000 neutrino photons/m2 second. See Chapter XX. > I'm not sure about any of that. I think dealing with the symmetry question might help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
