There are an equal number of electrons and positrons in our Universe. Each proton includes two positrons and only one electron. So the number of electrons outside of protons is equal to the number of positrons outside of protons plus half of the number of positrons inside protons. I think I did that right. My point is that the missing positrons are the extra positrons in the protons.
You asked why aren’t there an equal number of positrons and anti-protons. An anti-proton is comprised of two electrons plus a high energy positron that has captured a neutrino entron with a mass of 1.65 X 10-27 kg, exactly opposite the proton. Therefore, each anti-proton created removes two electrons but only one positron from the population of electrons and positrons . So there may be an equal number of positrons and anti-protons. This is a very good question. I’ll have to think about it some more. What I am fairly certain of (I would normally say “believe”) is that the number of electrons and positrons in our Universe is equal, but some of each are contained in protons and anti-protons. The number of plus and minus tronnies in our Universe is also equal. The number of protons and anti-protons are not equal. In Black Holes there is a relatively large number of free positrons and a large number of neutrino entrons due to the destruction of protons in the Black Holes. There is also a large number of free electrons. Therefore in Black Holes you have all you need to make anti-protons, So large numbers of anti-protons are made in Black Holes. So after they are made, they combine with a proton and both the proton and the anti-proton are destroyed releasing all of the electrons and positrons in both particles. Two neutrino entrons are also released. Most of these neutrino entrons are released from the Black Hole to produce the gravity of its galaxy. Some combine with electrons and positrons to produce either protons or anti-protons. Each anti-proton produced will result in the destruction of another proton and anti-proton. I calculate that if the Black Hole in the center of the Milky Way galaxy consumes the equivalent of an earth-size planet per day the resulting neutrino photon flux at our earth would be about 68,000 neutrino photons/m2 second. See Chapter XX. JohnR. From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:49 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TRONNIES On 29 May 2014 03:55, John Ross <jr...@trexenterprises.com> wrote: Good thinking. However, if charge is spread evenly over a sphere, parts of the charge would be touching adjacent parts so they would repel each other. But the repulsion would be finite, which was my point. In fact any shape object with evenly spread charge on its surface would have a finite repulsive force, and hence could hold together, so Coulomb's law doesn't mandate point particles after all. As to your last question, the answer is simple. I'm sure it is, but this isn't it: Tronnies combine to make three things: electrons (three tronnies), positrons (three tronnies) and entrons (two tronnies). Each photon is comprised of one entron. Everything else in our Universe is comprised of electrons, positrons and entrons. A proton is comprised of two positrons and an electron that has captured a neutrino entron with a mass of 1.65 X 10-27 kg. The proton that is the nucleus of hydrogen atoms also contains several (I estimate about 15) gamma ray entrons (see Chapter VIII). These are the composite building blocks of our Universe. For Standard Model folks a neutron is a proton, an electron and a gamma ray entron, but its life time is only 15 minutes (whether it is inside or outside nuclei). The question was, where does the asymmetry come from? You said T-theory explains the apparent imbalance between electrons and positrons, I pointed out that it also needs to explain the imbalance between electrons and protons - if you're right, you've explained a numerical asymmetry, but there is still an organisational asymmetry that is unexplained. That is, why aren't there an equal number of positrons and antiprotons as there are electrons and protons? Do you see the problem? Without an explanation for why that asymmetry exists (as opposed to merely explaining how the particles that exist are put together) you haven't got any further than the physicists who are baffled by the imbalance of electrons and positrons, because you have an (at least) equally baffling imbalance. (I say at least equally baffling because ISTM that symmetry breaking at the more fundamental level of electrons and quarks should be easier to explain than at the higher level of how the components organise themselves into non-fundamental particles.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
