On 9 June 2014 16:02, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps Alice gets future A with probability 0.9 and future B with > p=0.1, and Bob vice versa. > Sorry to be obtuse but I can't see how this works. Please could you spell it out as I tried to do, e.g. by assuming there are 10 future branches, both containing a copy of Alice and Bob. How does Alice get A with 0.9, etc? It doesn't appear to add up, but I may be missing something... > > Then there would be no zombies. But then the influence on subjective > probabilities is no longer infallible. > > You pays your money, and you takes your choices :). > > Cheers > > -- > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) > Principal, High Performance Coders > Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] > University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au > > Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret > (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
