Dear Chris,
not that your answer sounds a bit vague - I have deeper problems.
In my lately (2+decades) absobed agnostic views I find our science a bit
incomplete as explanatory ideas (with mathematical underlying) upon poorly
understood (iff...?) phenomena adjusted both into the *previous* images AND
the capabilities of our *present* mentality (previous meaning here: based
on an inventory of old, explained as well on the basis of the THEN theories
we could manage).
I find the dark things (matter, energy, hole) exciting and brilliant. Not
'real'.
They serve well in bringing our incomplete theories into a fit (just as the
'inflation' after the Big Bang etc.).
As a former chemist (1/2c polymer pioneering) I do not believe (my own?)
molecules of which I derived implemented technologies. They are maybe-s.
How 'bout infinite complexities?

Best regards

John M


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *John Mikes
> *Sent:* Friday, June 20, 2014 1:52 PM
> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: Solar power's "bright future" [ may be brighter thanks to
> us aping the quantum trickery of certain algae (cryptophytes specifically)]
>
>
>
> They ARE black! Our eyes err. - Without joke:
>
> how about those plants that are not green? do they have a chlorophyl
>
> variation that is not green? or a different photosynth-mechsm?
>
> JM
>
>
>
> Not sure I understand what you are saying – How I have understood the
> terms -- darkness (or black materials as well) is the absence of photons,
> or for a black material the absorption of incident photons.  Plants reflect
> a large number of photons. This glaring (well reflective at least LOL)
> sub-optimal utilization of available spectrum does seem to indicate that
> this could be the result of a local evolutionary optima as Russell
> suggested.
>
> My – off the top of my head guess – would be that the genetics and/or the
> molecular machinery of chloroplasts have evolved into this corner and
> cannot back out of this local optimization without breaking the machinery
> in place that is necessary in order to sustain the organism. Even with this
> sub-optimal apparatus green plants have done well for themselves on earth –
> a life form just needs to be good enough to outcompete the alternatives and
> fill an environmental niche (until it meets its match or the edge
> boundaries of the niche in which it has a competitive advantage)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:15 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have long thought that plants should be black, too, for this reason.
> Anyone know why not?
>
>
>
> On 20 June 2014 11:40, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
> everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps because the two mechanisms function quite differently and
> apparently evolved independently. But I also sometimes wonder why in the
> many hundreds of millions of years of time that no species has found a way
> to utilize the missing chunk of spectrum.
>
> A perfect plant would have jet black leaves -- and use photons across all
> wavelengths of the spectrum. Then there truly would be black forests.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> Bacteriorhodopsin - Boundless Open Textbook
> <https://www.boundless.com/microbiology/microbial-metabolism/phototrophy/bacteriorhodopsin/>
>
> [image: image]
> <https://www.boundless.com/microbiology/microbial-metabolism/phototrophy/bacteriorhodopsin/>
>
> Bacteriorhodopsin - Boundless Open Textbook
> <https://www.boundless.com/microbiology/microbial-metabolism/phototrophy/bacteriorhodopsin/>
>
> Bacteriorhodopsin acts a proton pump, generating cellular energy in a
> manner independent of chlorophyll. Read more about bacteriorhodopsin in the
> Bou...
>
> View on *www.boundless.com*
> <https://www.boundless.com/microbiology/microbial-metabolism/phototrophy/bacteriorhodopsin/>
>
> Preview by Yahoo
>
>
> *Bacteriorhodopsin acts a proton pump, generating cellular energy in a
> manner independent of chlorophyll.*
> KEY POINTS
>
> · Bacteriorhodopsin is a proton pump found in Archaea, it takes light
> energy and coverts it into chemical energy, ATP, that can be used by the
> cell for cellular functions.
>
> · Bacteriorhodopsin forms chains, which contain retinal molecule
> <https://www.boundless.com/definition/molecules/> within, it is the
> retinal molecule that absorbs a photon from light, it then changes the
> confirmation of the nearby Bacteriorhodopsin protein, allowing it to act as
> a proton pump.
>
> · While chlorophyll based ATP generation depends on a protein gradient,
> like bacteriorhodopsin, but with striking differences, suggesting that
> phototrophy evolved in bacteria
> <https://www.boundless.com/definition/bacteria/> and archaea
> independently of each other.
>
> [snip]
>
> These [bacteriochlorophylls ] also produce a proton gradient, but in a
> quite different and more indirect way involving an electron transfer chain
> consisting of several other proteins. Furthermore, chlorophylls are aided
> in capturing light energy by other pigments known as "antennas"; these are
> not present in bacteriorhodopsin-based systems. Last, chlorophyll-based
> phototrophy is coupled to carbon fixation
> <https://www.boundless.com/definition/fixation/> (the incorporation of
> carbon dioxide into larger organic molecules) and for that reason is
> photosynthesis, which is not true for bacteriorhodopsin-based system.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net>
> *To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:51 AM
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Solar power's "bright future" [ may be brighter thanks to
> us aping the quantum trickery of certain algae (cryptophytes specifically)]
>
>
>
> On 6/18/2014 3:15 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
>
> >>But it does illustrate the way evolution can get stuck in a local
> optima. And also further evidence that any purported Creator must be
> completely incompetent.
>
>
>
> Evolution always must begin with a preexisting platform -- so to speak --
> and builds on top of it (in an evolutionary way).
>
>
> Yes, I'd heard the story about the purple bacteriodopsin that used the
> middle part of the visible spectrum.  But the implication is that these
> bacteria were shading the bacteria or algae that developed chlorophyll.
> Which might be true, but they've not been shading them for the last billion
> years or so since plants came onto the land.  So I don't see it has a local
> optimum.  There's a big chunk of spectrum right there adjacent to the
> spectrum being used.  There doesn't seem to be any significant barrier.
>
> Brent
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to