On 18 Jul 2014, at 19:14, Alberto G. Corona wrote:

What is the point in the last paragraphs written by me in which you do
not agree?.

No theories at all is zero-informative, and saying that they are "no- theory" is incomprehensible.

I see that you seem to believe in evolution, but this assumes the theory (comp) that I study the consequences of.

So I fail to grasp what you try to say. It looks like a criticism though, and that would be interesting, but I don't see it, in fact.

Bruno







2014-07-18 18:57 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>:

On 18 Jul 2014, at 11:52, Alberto G. Corona wrote:

Thereforeeee... my dear friends atheists, agnostics and deists....

The salvation vessel of monistic materialism, the theories of
everything that predict infinite many universes with infinite physical
laws, either arithmetical or mathemathical, are compatible with any
metaphisical or theological position: metaphysical dualism,
monotheism, politheism etc

in a sense these theories not only give zero information in physical
terms but also in metaphysical terms. So we can say that they are
perfect non-theories.


?

The question is: do you think possible that brains and bodies obeys
computable laws?

If not, what is your theory of mind?

If yes, then, the point I make is that there is no other alternatives
than to derive the physical laws from specific glueing conditions on
our computationally accessible consistent extensions.

Contrary to what you say, this leads to a precise theory of mind,
including a theory of observable, which leads to experimentally
testable predications.

You seem to not have studied neither UDA, nor AUDA. Both are develop
here,

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html

or here:

 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.03.014

and Kim sent to the list a typo and english corrected version of that
last publication.

Ask any question if you have any difficulty.

I am aware that it can be hard to understand for people who believes
"religiously" in a primitive physical universe, or in the Aristotelian
notion of primary matter. Thousands and thousands of excellent
publication on cannabis seems to take time to help people to
understand that the "big" danger of the cannabis was propaganda. For
the consequence of comp, we face worst, both 1500 years of propaganda,
and millions of years of implicit programming by nature and the
survival goal.

So take it easy. I am not proposing a new theory. I just show that two
basic principles are incompatible: mechanism and materialism (UDA),
and that we can already interview (in a quite literal sense) machines
about this.


Bruno




2014-07-17 19:07 GMT+02:00, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>:
Why I have to claim that?

I claim that any monistic ("scientific") theory that predict infinite
many universes predict also infinite many minds with infinite many
degrees of knowledge and mastering over their realities and the
realities that they may create, that, assuming monistic materialism, can contain also other subordinate minds. Because we do not know our
position in the hierarchy etc etc etc etc

2014-07-17 18:16 GMT+02:00, spudboy100 via Everything List
<[email protected]>:

You cannot now claim, baring evidence, that we can change reality,
even
here
on planet Earth, in a cogent way. It's like somebody falling off Mt.
Evidence, in which we can have an opinion about our dilemma, but
reversing
gravity or dreaming up a parachute to use during our fall is not
part of
the
world we all must live in. Give 10,000 years of future technology,
and
human
survival, maybe then.

Any theory of everithing that implies infinite many unverses in
compatible with everithing. Gods, miracles, psicquism, telequinesia,
telepaty etc  starting from the. monistic materialism, some
configurations of matter produce minds, thererfore under these
theories are infinite many variations of minds, not potentially.
They
are logical predictions of these theories.

These minds under monistic materialism are considered as matter that can reshape matter in a complex way. Some of these minds can create second level realities in which they may act as gods, either making
use of extraordinary knowledge of reality in relation with other
less
advanced minds, for which they may appear as gods. or alternatively they can simulate virtual realities in which accoding with monistic
materialism can simulate minds inside these second level simulated
realities.

These superior minds are free to change the realities that they have under partial control (in the first case) or under total control (in
the second). So they can perform miracles and so on and so on.

We don´t know what is our level as minds in the multiverse,
therefore
everithing is theoretically possible even under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.






-----Original Message-----
From: Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist


2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>:

On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:

The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.

Which one? What do you mean by "absolutely everything"?



they
are no longer materialistic. Either they are no-theories or they
allow
any interpretation anyone may like about the know and unknow
reality.

I really don't know what theories you refer too.

Any theory of everithing that implies infinite many unverses in
compatible with everithing. Gods, miracles, psicquism, telequinesia,
telepaty etc  starting from the. monistic materialism, some
configurations of matter produce minds, thererfore under these
theories are infinite many variations of minds, not potentially.
They
are logical predictions of these theories.

These minds under monistic materialism are considered as matter that can reshape matter in a complex way. Some of these minds can create second level realities in which they may act as gods, either making
use of extraordinary knowledge of reality in relation with other
less
advanced minds, for which they may appear as gods. or alternatively they can simulate virtual realities in which accoding with monistic
materialism can simulate minds inside these second level simulated
realities.

These superior minds are free to change the realities that they have under partial control (in the first case) or under total control (in
the second). So they can perform miracles and so on and so on.

We don´t know what is our level as minds in the multiverse,
therefore
everithing is theoretically possible even under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.







In certain sense materialism has given up without being
conscious of
it. That is because its foundation is metaphysical and
metaphysics has
experimented a regression to the stone age, or at least to the
level
previous to the greek phylosophy.

That has begun since theology has been banished from academy, and
replaced by a social sort of authorianism.

It is normal for those wanting power to take over on the
fundamental
theories. It is bad and sad, but natural and usual. That's why we
must
be vigilant, and fight for a coming back to reason and
observation in
*all* fields, not just on God and health.

Bruno






2014-07-09 22:12 GMT+02:00, John Mikes <[email protected]>:
I apologize for taking a new title for this over-discussed topic.
Somebody (sounds like Bruno, the fonts look like Brent) wrote:

"...let us do theology seriously instead of referring to fairy
tales.
You confirm what I said to John Clark. *Atheist* defend the God
of
the
bible. Read Plotinus, forget the bible, unless you find some
passage
you like and which inspire you, but that is private, don't make
that
public. "

I  refer to the generality about 'atheists' in the passage. I
emphasize that I am no atheist in such a sense who IMO requires
'a
god
to deny' (my vocabulary includes the term as 'denying' instead of
'defending').

I simply exclude those facets which are beyond our reach at
present.
In speaking about Everything I think of an infinite complexity of components we cannot even understand (today) - nor the relations
between them ALL. We include SOME into our 'model of the world'
as of
yesterday without knowing if we are right.

In such sense even a (sane-minded) adilt can be an 'atheist'.

John M

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to everything-
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Alberto.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-
list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Alberto.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an
email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything- list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything- list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Alberto.



--
Alberto.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to everything- [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Alberto.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to