On 22 Oct 2014, at 00:06, LizR wrote:
On 22 October 2014 02:01, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
On 21 Oct 2014, at 00:24, LizR wrote:
On 21 October 2014 04:06, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
On 20 Oct 2014, at 01:20, LizR wrote:
Hi Richard
I'm only on page 2 of your paper, but already confused. You appear
to be positing that a mathematical universe might have a physical
underpinning. If so, this rather defangs the MUH,
OK.
which obtains its importance from being logically prior to (the
appearance of) a material universe. Without that assumption
Which assumption?
The assumption that the MUH makes mathematics logically prior to a
material universe.
is that not part of the MUH?
Yes, which was my point. Deriving the MUH from a primitively
physical universe appears like a pointless exercise.
OK. That was not clear for me. I think that Richard agreed. Good :)
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
