On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Kim Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Agreement and disagreement are not aspects of real thinking. >>> >> > >> So if I assume you do real thinking then I must conclude that you don't >> agree with what you wrote above. >> > > > you seek to find a logical contradiction as a way of invalidating my > assertion > I didn't just seek it I found it, and I can't imagine a better way of invalidating a assertion than finding a logical contradiction in it. > There is no logical contradiction in my assertion. I neither agree with > it nor disagree with it. > If you don't agree with what you write how do you find the energy to push the keys on your keyboard? And if your writing is so inofensive, bland and information poor as to elicit no reaction of any sort from anyone why should they bother to read such pablum? > I present it as an observation. > A observation that you don't agree is valid. > You clearly saw a (negative) value in what I wrote because you have > responded to what I wrote. > True, but I'm not the one who wrote "agreement and disagreement are not aspects of real thinking" and In fact I disagree with your statement. > Being wrong is creative. > Okey dokey > > I don't do argument. > Then why wasn't that the only sentence in your post? > you are more interested in winning armchair arguments and launching ad > hominems than doing real science. Didn't your mommy love you enough when > you were young, Sunshine? That's the only explanation that sticks for this > chest-beating profile you have built for yourself. > And unlike me at least you don't stoop to launching ad hominems. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
