LizR wrote:
On 10 November 2014 16:01, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    LizR wrote:

        On 8 November 2014 16:53, John Clark <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM, meekerdb
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
        wrote:

                >  I'd say that expansion of the universe is almost
        necessary,
not contingent. I'd say that by about 1850 when people started to have a
            understanding of what Entropy was physicists had all they
        needed to
            have known that the universe must have started out in a very
        very
            low entropy state, that is to say they could have predicted
        the Big
            Bang in the early to mid 19th century; and they wouldn't
        have needed
            to go near a telescope to do so. But unfortunately they
        didn't, it's
            one of the great failures of nerve or imagination in the
        history of
            science.
        Another feature of the big bang / expanding universe is that it
        continually raises the entropy ceiling (maxium entropy that can
        exist in a given volume).


    I think you should stop saying this. It is not true. You have not
    defined what you mean by "maximum entropy" nor have you specified
    how that maximum is calculated. If the maximum is defined as when
    all available degrees of freedom are in thermal equilibrium, then
    the universe has never been in such a state of maximum entropy, and
    it probably will not be until all matter has collapsed into black
    holes and these have decayed by Hawking radiation.


I'm dealing with classical thermodynamics, i.e. ignoring gravity and only talking about the arrangements of particles. I don't know how to incorporate gravity into the picture. If that makes what I'm suggesting inadmissible, fair enough.

It does. The physics of the BB is set by gravity, so one cannot sensibly consider conditions then without including gravity. Classical thermodynamics simple does not cut it.

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to