On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 20 Nov 2014, at 01:03, Russell Standish wrote:
>
>  On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:06:47AM -0500, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The collapse hypothesis is correct if we need to conserve the total
>>> energy
>>> and information in the universe.
>>> Richard
>>>
>>
>>
>> Wavefunction collapse creates information, it does not conserve it.
>>
>> Conserving information is equivalent to demanding unitarity of
>> evolution. Wave function collapse is non-unitary.
>>
>
> Exactly. It is the advantage of the "many-worlds". The evolution of the
> universe/multiverse is a unitary transformation in the configuration space
> (the Hilbert space). It is deterministic, reversible, and let the
> probabilities and the information invariant. It is also local. And it
> explains why the memories of the observers contains appearance of
> indeterminacy (in a way coherent with computationalism that Everett
> assumed), non-locality, irreversibility, etc.
>
> Like you say: the collapse, if it was a physical phenomenon, would just
> contradict QM. The collapse is really an axiom saying that QM is false when
> observers do measurement. But this has never been successfully clarified,
> imo.
>


With a sufficient number of observations/measurements the entire wave
function is mapped out on the detector screen.
Therefore experimental measurements verify QM. It seems we live in an
energy conserving but non-unitary, information-creating universe.
Richard


>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
>> Principal, High Performance Coders
>> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
>> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>>
>> Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret
>>         (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to