On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:48 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:27:06 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:11 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Roger,
>>>>
>>>> I have a question for you.
>>>>
>>>> Do you believe the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of Pi has a certain
>>>> definite value, which is either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9?
>>>>
>>>> If so, would you still believe this if you knew that this number is too
>>>> difficult to ever compute by anyone in this universe?
>>>>
>>>> Does this not point to a discontinuity between mathematical truth and
>>>> conceivably of that truth by us limited creatures with limited minds in a
>>>> limited universe? Perhaps it does take faith to believe that digit takes a
>>>> certain value between 0 and 9, but it's easier for me to accept that on
>>>> faith than the converse (that it is not any one of those digits).
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Jason,
>>>
>>>     What I believe is that there is no proposition outside a mind/head
>>> that relates a circle's circumference and its diameter to get a number
>>> called pi.
>>>
>>
>> But that wasn't my question. Do you think that that the digit has a
>> certain definite value (despite not being known by any human) or perhaps
>> any being in this physical universe?  Let's work by steps, do you think the
>> 10^1th digit has a definite value? Do you think the 10^6th digit has a
>> certain definite value? Do you think the 10^Nth digit has a definite value
>> (for any given N)) ?
>>
>>
>>
>>> What I think does exist is:
>>>
>>> o A circle could exist either outside the mind or inside the mind/head
>>> as the mental construct labeled "a circle".
>>>
>>> o It takes a mind to come up with a proposition that says that if you
>>> divide the circumference of a circle by its diameter, you get pi, and that
>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of this pi is one of the numbers from
>>> 0-9.
>>>
>>
>> Do you believe that *one and only one* of the following statements is
>> true?
>>
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 0
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 1
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 2
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 3
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 4
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 5
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 6
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 7
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 8
>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 9
>>
>> Either you answer yes, or no to that question. If you answer yes, I don't
>> see how you can escape mathematical realism.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
> Jason,
>
>     I believe the following:
>
> o I do believe that the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi is either
> 0-9.
>

Yet no mind has conceived what it is. It exists and yet it exists outside
the mind of any person, which seems counter to your clams below.


>
> o That 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi and its value of 0-9 exists
> only in the mind of the person where the proposition defining pi exists.
>

So does defining what Pi is lead to the existence of all of its infinite
digits, even if those digits are never considered by a conscious mind?

If a conscious mind can reify other things it doesn't concevie why does any
mind need to reify the first concept (of pi) at all?


>
> o That 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi does not exist outside the
> mind of the person where the proposition defining pi is.
>
>     I also believe that the above was easily deducible from my first reply
>

Do you see how the above sentence can be construed as condescending?


> and that there's no need to be condescending (Your "Let's work by steps").
>
>

I did not intend to be condescendin, I only sought greater clarification
because your original post did not directly address my question. Breaking a
complex problem into steps can isolate where the disagreement (if any)
exists.

Jason


>
>               Roger
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>  So, this proposition and its value as true or false only exists inside
>>> a mind/head even if it describes a circle that's outside the mind.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to