On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:04 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 2:52:34 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:48 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:27:06 AM UTC-5, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:11 PM, 'Roger' via Everything List <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Roger,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a question for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you believe the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of Pi has a
>>>>>> certain definite value, which is either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If so, would you still believe this if you knew that this number is
>>>>>> too difficult to ever compute by anyone in this universe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this not point to a discontinuity between mathematical truth and
>>>>>> conceivably of that truth by us limited creatures with limited minds in a
>>>>>> limited universe? Perhaps it does take faith to believe that digit takes 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> certain value between 0 and 9, but it's easier for me to accept that on
>>>>>> faith than the converse (that it is not any one of those digits).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Jason,
>>>>>
>>>>>     What I believe is that there is no proposition outside a mind/head
>>>>> that relates a circle's circumference and its diameter to get a number
>>>>> called pi.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But that wasn't my question. Do you think that that the digit has a
>>>> certain definite value (despite not being known by any human) or perhaps
>>>> any being in this physical universe?  Let's work by steps, do you think the
>>>> 10^1th digit has a definite value? Do you think the 10^6th digit has a
>>>> certain definite value? Do you think the 10^Nth digit has a definite value
>>>> (for any given N)) ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What I think does exist is:
>>>>>
>>>>> o A circle could exist either outside the mind or inside the mind/head
>>>>> as the mental construct labeled "a circle".
>>>>>
>>>>> o It takes a mind to come up with a proposition that says that if you
>>>>> divide the circumference of a circle by its diameter, you get pi, and that
>>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of this pi is one of the numbers from
>>>>> 0-9.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you believe that *one and only one* of the following statements is
>>>> true?
>>>>
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 0
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 1
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 2
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 3
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 4
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 5
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 6
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 7
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 8
>>>> the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal digit of pi is 9
>>>>
>>>> Either you answer yes, or no to that question. If you answer yes, I
>>>> don't see how you can escape mathematical realism.
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Jason,
>>>
>>>     I believe the following:
>>>
>>> o I do believe that the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi is either
>>> 0-9.
>>>
>>
>> Yet no mind has conceived what it is. It exists and yet it exists outside
>> the mind of any person, which seems counter to your clams below.
>>
>
>>
>>>
>>> o That 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi and its value of 0-9
>>> exists only in the mind of the person where the proposition defining pi
>>> exists.
>>>
>>
>> So does defining what Pi is lead to the existence of all of its infinite
>> digits, even if those digits are never considered by a conscious mind?
>>
>> If a conscious mind can reify other things it doesn't concevie why does
>> any mind need to reify the first concept (of pi) at all?
>>
>
> Roger:  Even if no mind has yet conceived the the 10^(10^(10^100))th
> decimal point of pi, the pi proposition and therefore the process of
> calculating its 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point and being confident that
> if you do the process that that number is either 0-9 are all located inside
> the mind/head.  My view is that whenever we talk about something existing,
> we have to specify where and when it exists, that is, in what context or
> domain it exists.  A thing can exist in one place and not another.  A ball
> can exist outside the head, and a mental construct labeled "the concept of
> a ball" can exist inside the head.
>

If a ball can exist outside the mind/head, why can't the 10^(10^(10^100))th
decimal point of pi exist outside the mind/head? What property must a thing
have to have an independent existence outside of any mind? (according to
your theory?)

Jason


> So, if the pi process were carried out inside the mind/head long enough to
> figure out the 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point, that mental construct for
> that number (which would be 0-9) would exist inside the mind/head but not
> outside the mind/head.  So, the mind is able to reify things (like the 
> 10^(10^(10^100))th
> decimal point of pi) so that they exist but so that they only exist inside
> the mind/head and not outside the mind/head.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> o That 10^(10^(10^100))th decimal point of pi does not exist outside the
>>> mind of the person where the proposition defining pi is.
>>>
>>>     I also believe that the above was easily deducible from my first
>>> reply
>>>
>>
>> Do you see how the above sentence can be construed as condescending?
>>
>>
>>> and that there's no need to be condescending (Your "Let's work by
>>> steps").
>>>
>>
>> I did not intend to be condescendin, I only sought greater clarification
>> because your original post did not directly address my question. Breaking a
>> complex problem into steps can isolate where the disagreement (if any)
>> exists.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>
> Roger: Agreed.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  So, this proposition and its value as true or false only exists
>>>>> inside a mind/head even if it describes a circle that's outside the mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roger
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to