>> And a fair answer would be they turned psychotic because they believed in a 
>> psychotic religion. 

No that would be a stupid answer because we know that it is hogwash. 

Firstly, we know that the overwhelmingly vast majority of muslims do not turn 
psychotic in the face of cartoons.

Secondly, we know that learning the Koran acts as a defense against violence. 
Being taught the koran at madrassa is negatively correlated with becoming 
radicalized.

thirdly, we know that Coulibaly, for example, came to Islam late. He had 
already accrued several convictions for violent and drug related crimes before 
he was 18. A psychologist reports he had an immature and psychotic personality. 
He was converted to radical Islam during a spell in prison for armed robbery, 
prior to that he had probably never even seen a Koran. In these respects he 
follows a fairly typical profile.

He was allegedly introduced to Islam by Djamel Begal. Begal, a 'french' 
Algerian ... and we all know why Algerians are fucked off don't we? ... and 
erstwhile family man who worked for a homeless charity in the UK, had been 
arrested and tortured in Dubai while traveling to Afgahnistan in 2000. There 
was no evidence he was involved in any criminal activities. Tortures included 
anal rape, urethral insertions, ripping out finger nails, mock executions, 
force feeding, sleep deprivation and so on. The torture went on and on under 
the influence of pain enhancing hallucinogenic drugs for months. He was later 
returned to france where he was convicted on terrorism charges without recourse 
to a lawyer and imprisoned for ten years. Wikileaks would later release 
communications from the french judge who convicted Begal admitting that the 
evidence against him was insufficient. Why was Begal radicalized? Well, it was 
probably the words in a silly book rather than the torture and imprisonment he 
was subjected to with impunity and Frances colonial history. I mean an idiot 
might think so anyway.

Fourthly, Coulibaly was actually recorded explaining his motivations: 

"Every time, they try to make you think Muslims are terrorists. I was born in 
France. If they hadn't been attacked elsewhere I wouldn't be here. I'll tell 
them to stop attacking the Islamic State, stop unveiling our women, stop 
putting our brothers in prison for everything and anything. You're the ones who 
elected your governments, and the governments never hid their intentions to be 
at war in Mali or elsewhere."

So whats with Mali then? Like many African countries Mali's society was ripped 
apart by French brutality and was conquered in the 1800s. A series of coups and 
military interventions and Frances' thoroughly evil colonial taxation system 
has ensured it remains under French control directly or by proxy ever since. 
Last time the French bombed peasants in Mali was in 2013. What a bunch of 
wankers.

Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:50:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Why was nobody murdered because of this cartoon?
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:49 PM, chris peck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since 1961 muslims have been subjected to increasingly draconian 
restrictions on their freedome and a media that depicts them in as 
dehumanizing way as possible. 

Well, the media certainly didn't need to work very hard to do that! In recent 
days it has been remarkably easy to depict Islamic culture as dehumanizing. 

> The wankers at Charlie Hebdo are part of 
that. Of course they should be free to do it, but its no wonder this 
marginalized sector feels angry about it.

Feeling angry is the natural state for Muslims. In the thirteenth century 
Islamic culture was the most advanced and progressive on the planet, but it's 
been straight downhill ever since, and today finding something to be offended 
about at is the only thing Islamic culture is still really really good at.

 > The media now presents the 
story as though white french people should be afraid of Algerians.

This has nothing to do with Algeria, the French or  Charlie Hebdo, this has to 
do with Islamic values. Charlie Hebdo isn't even the worst or most idiotic  
Islam vs cartoon war. Back in 2005 it was Danish cartoons not French cartoons 
that cause violent riots and set Muslim nitwits off on a murder spree that 
ended up killing more than 200 people. Let me know if you think the cartoons 
deserved such a violent reaction, they were originally in Dutch but you can 
view them here with their English translation: 

http://www.aina.org/releases/20060201143237.htm 

  John k Clark







-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].

To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to