Yeah, he is prolific. Publish or perish? His view is reflected in the papers of your compatriot, Whitworth, at Auckland Math(s) department. It sort of works for me because of me brain. Me brain has the amygdala which laffs or cries, and me cerebrum, deals with logic and executive functions. What I admire about Steinhart is that it seems to satisfy both, for me. Let me know if you come across anyone similar. Ta.
-----Original Message----- From: LizR <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 7:13 pm Subject: Re: Cosmology from Quantum Potential There are a lot of them mentioned here ... http://www.ericsteinhart.com/abstracts.html It sounds interesting, and I may look more closely - but it would take a long time to read and thoroughly digest everything. (Perhaps I will find the time in a digital afterlife...) On 18 February 2015 at 01:48, spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> wrote: Interesting Liz. Steinhart's "theology" is available in various papers of his that are downloadable. He uses logic, physics, and computer science to explore what he believes actually exists. Quantum Potential seems like an additional fix. The man's an atheist but a spinoza kind of atheist, if you dig? His stuff seems highly compatible with Bruno's and Max Tegmark's pov. In that its Plato-based (neo-platonism?). He also uses evolution to discern simpler computational states evolve into higher computational states. QP seems right up there. -----Original Message----- From: LizR <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Feb 15, 2015 4:15 pm Subject: Re: Cosmology from Quantum Potential On 15 February 2015 at 07:00, spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> wrote: Being a fool, I ask, Is it possible to do a theology (In the Marchal sense of the word) from quantum potential? Just asking. Assuming quantum potential supports a universal computer, I imagine so. Although Bruno's theology is (or appears to be) derived from Arithmetical realism, so I assume that ultimately, quantum potential would have to just be what "drops out of" all the first person viewpoints generated by the UD. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
