This may seem off the subject, but conservation of mass-energy must not be correct, otherwise our Universe could not have become so large (in terms of both mass and energy).
With the recognition of the existence of tronnies, everything in our Universe can be explained very simply. Explanations of our Universe based on the quark model are much more complicated. I suppose it is possible that the quark model is correct and that my model is incorrect. Until someone provides some proof that my model is basically flawed, I am sticking with it. As an example the quark model presumes that there are neutrons in the nuclei of stable atoms. But neutrons have a half-life to 10.23 minutes. I have shown that all stable and long-lived atoms can be constructed with alpha particles (59 for uranium 236), electrons (26 for uranium 236), up to three protons (zero for U-236) and gamma ray entrons (a total of 297.15 MeV for U-236). You know what happens to some of those gamma ray entrons when U-236 splits. U-235 is comprised of 58 alpha particles, three protons and 27 electrons and 293.42 MeV of gamma ray entrons. When it absorbs a neutron it either fissions or the proton in the neutron combines with the three protons to produce an additional (the 59th)alpha particle in U-236. The electron in the neutron becomes the 28th electron in the U-236 isotope. U-236 has a half-life of 2.342 X 107 years and decays with an alpha particle. John Ross From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Cosmology from Quantum Potential On 14 February 2015 at 06:47, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: Liz, A universe from nothing may sound absurd but a universe that has always existed and had no beginning is more absurd. Neither of these is absurd. That would just be human preconceptions, based around the domain we evolved in, in which mass-energy is conserved and things change regularly. I have shown that it is possible to construct everything in our Universe with an equal number of point particles with charges of plus and minus e. Add them all together and you can get a universe or you can get nothing. However you do it, you're still left with the laws governing their existence, and unanswered questions like "why should tronnies appear,rather than quarks (or anything else) ?" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
