On 17 February 2015 at 09:50, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> This may seem off the subject, but conservation of mass-energy must not be > correct, otherwise our Universe could not have become so large (in terms of > both *mass and energy)*. > > > I believe this is true. Mass-energy isn't conserved on cosmological scales by universes obeying general relativity. > As an example the quark model presumes that there are neutrons in the > nuclei of stable atoms. But neutrons have a half-life to 10.23 minutes. > This is explained by the Pauli exclusion principle - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron#Bound_neutron_decay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
