On 20 March 2015 at 20:57, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:
> A fundamental difference in science is that peer reviewers are other > scientists, working on their own research. There are no professional > critics in science. > > That's true (I think). But there are plenty of commentators and so on, as well as science popularisers, and some scientists who are critical of others outside their areas of expertise. And some who are just critical of others full stop (Fred Hoyle was one I believe). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
