The left need some nuclear victim. It is not surprising for me how they live from the myths and propaganda of the cold war. No matter that it is no longer necessary to stop the West in his advance in nuclear technology to help the socialist countries. They still are attached to the myths that the soviet propaganda and their fabian puppets created. The block for which the useful idiots worked vanished, but who makes the useful idiots to understand that?
The same happens with the gender ideology, created by the Soviets to weaken the West. In general all the stupidification ideas in education the socialist leaning economy (keynessianism, invented by Marx 50 years, before keynes) the gay agenda, the violent black movements, the pacifist and finally the ecologists all of them were created to serve the interest of the soviet agenda by people with ties to the "socialist motherland". But the amazing thing is that the main victim of such intended stupidification is the left itself, that swallowed their own propaganda. The first marxist were educated in traditional families that valorated the effort. Gramsci, Marx, Engels were people well versed in philosophy, literature, the sciences of their time. Now the mean intellectual leftist is a shouting liberal which only care about their feelings and feed his hate trying to extend their market of supposed victims of capitalism by an ever expanding list of mechanisms: machism, economical exploitation, contamination, anythingphobia etc with no intellectual grounds but his own marketing of hate. 2015-03-23 9:58 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:48 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am saying that I don't know if uranium fission can be made safer, and >> cheaper. I also think that part of the cost is waste management. I think >> that natural gas, solar and wind (with Storage) may now be the past of >> least resistance. > > > Fair enough. I don't know either, I just have the impression that a lot of > people who protest nuclear power (and influence political decisions) also > don't know. > > Telmo. > > >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> >> To: everything-list <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sat, Mar 21, 2015 5:24 pm >> Subject: Re: TEPCO admits Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 core completely melted >> down >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:08 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 3/21/2015 9:05 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: >>> >>> We can yap about technology but it's all out of our hands. Nuclear >>> fission has taken permanent hit because of its cost$. It's not safety that >>> halted uranium, but money. In a darwinian fashion, natural gas has >>> superseded uranium, from a cost-price ratio. Could fission or solar >>> re-take the hill top any time soon? Will fusion ever be there? Don't know, >>> and since I have no power to influence, don't care. >>> >>> >>> That's because fossil fuels don't pay for the environmental damage >>> they do >>> >> >> The problem I have with this argument is that it assumes that either: >> >> a) there is some straightforward way of converting money into >> environmental damage mitigation, or >> b) that the disincentive introduced by making fossil fuels less >> lucrative would lead to their replacement with cleaner technologies. >> >> >>> and because the exaggerated fear of radiation drives up the cost of >>> nuclear power. >>> >> >> From my limited knowledge nuclear power seems to be the best shot at >> b). I tend to agree with JCK that Fukushima can be taken as a reason to >> trust nuclear power more: a perfect storm of natural disasters struck a >> nuclear power plan based on old technology and still nobody died. But Chris >> claim that the tragic effects may only be detectable in the long term also >> seems reasonable. >> >> Telmo. >> >> >>> >>> Brent >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
