On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > We can't detect intelligence in machine, does not mean that machine are > not intelligent. We can't detect intelligence in human too. >
Thus Sarah Palin could be more intelligent than Albert Einstein, and so in Bruno Marchal's continuing reformulation of the English language "intelligence" joins "God" and "Christianity" and "Atheism" as words that no longer have any meaning. > John, I recall you that I suggest that the machine PA is already > intelligent I'm trying to decode that statement but I'm having difficulty. My first thought is Peano Axioms but that doesn't seem right. Power Amplifier? Public Address? Prince Albert? Pennsylvania? >> All I'm saying is that whatever method we use in judging the >> intelligence of our fellow human beings, and we all do it every waking hour >> of every day of our lives, we should use the same method in judging >> machines. > > > > Oh, if that is *all* what you say, we do agree. > No we don't agree because you just said "We can't detect intelligence in a human", and I can't detect any intelligence in that statement. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
