On 3/23/2015 5:46 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 March 2015 at 13:15, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    On 3/23/2015 3:59 PM, LizR wrote:
    On 24 March 2015 at 11:08, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net
    <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

        Or you can throw out the assumption that conscious thought is 
independent of an
        external world.This assumption comes easily to Platonist because they 
think
        Platonia exists independent of any worlds; but I find it very 
suspicious.


    Doesn't that take you back to the starting point of Bruno's argument? If 
conscious
    thought depends on the world, then either it's a computation, or part of one
    (apparently the argument works even if you have to assume the HUbble sphere 
is
    digitally simulatable, if that's the right word) - in which case we seem led
    inexorably to the UDA/MGA/TLA - or it's something else.

    What else could it be?
    The difference is that you can't separate out a material instantiation of a
    computation and say that because it can be inert that shows that 
consciousness
    doesn't need matter.  If consciousness is computation then it can be 
implemented in
    different substances, but there must be a whole world implemented in that 
substance
    too for the consciousness to be conscious OF.  The projected sequence of 
the MGA
    isn't conscious in this world because it doesn't interact with this world. 
We tend
    to intuit that it's conscious because we see the causal connection to this 
world,
    but to be conscious it would have to be part of a whole projected world in 
which it
    acted.  This is not longer so radical.  It's just saying to could digitally 
simulate
    a world and conscious beings within it.  The simulation might look inert to 
us in
    our world, as it would if it were just written out on paper, but from 
within the
    simulation it would look dynamic.


I think you've answered your own objection there. There's no reason (in principle) for the world not to be simulated, I assume.

Right. In which case there's also no meaning to saying it is simulated. To be simulated is only meaningful when it is relative to a really real world.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to