I'm sorry, yes I am big and ugly, but I must insert a reality check on this. 
"Sure, Stalin was a mass murderer of millions, but communism could still work!" 
Yeah, it worked for Stalin, then it worked for Mao where we had the largest die 
off (aside from the 1347 plague) in human history. We had Pol Pot and we have 
the Kim dynasty. What more evidence do we need that communists will do 
murdering big time. 


Why not say, "Ah! but the Third Reich was only going through it's baby steps, 
and thus, made a few mistakes along the way." Communism, as a governmental form 
leads to bigtime killings, and the economics aren't very good either. 



Thanks Brent, I keep saying this but seem to get reactions along the lines of 
Stalin was evil therefore communism can't work for anyone, ever. It not only 
works for tribes, families and villages, it can even work to a reasonable 
extent in societies where people are closely related. There appears to be a 
rough correlation between the degree of interrelatedness of people in a socity 
and the degree to which social welfare programmes and so on are implemented, in 
my admittedly limited experience.    
   
   
  
  
You forgot to mention that it works very well for the upper class, too, who 
tend to look after themselves with old boys' networks etc. Hence the slogan of 
the West should really be - "capitalism for the masses, communism for the rich!"





-----Original Message-----
From: LizR <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 8:42 pm
Subject: Re: Life in the Islamic State for women


 
Brent:  
  
   
   
    
     
Communism is not a terrible idea - it works fine for families.  A lot of 
political problems come from trying to extend ethics that evolved for families 
and small tribes to nation states of millions of unrelated people.     
     
      
     
    
    
Thanks Brent, I keep saying this but seem to get reactions along the lines of 
Stalin was evil therefore communism can't work for anyone, ever. It not only 
works for tribes, families and villages, it can even work to a reasonable 
extent in societies where people are closely related. There appears to be a 
rough correlation between the degree of interrelatedness of people in a socity 
and the degree to which social welfare programmes and so on are implemented, in 
my admittedly limited experience.    
   
   
  
  
You forgot to mention that it works very well for the upper class, too, who 
tend to look after themselves with old boys' networks etc. Hence the slogan of 
the West should really be - "capitalism for the masses, communism for the 
rich!"  
  
   
  
 
  
 --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to  [email protected]. 
 To post to this group, send email to  [email protected]. 
 Visit this group at  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
 For more options, visit  https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to