On 9 April 2015 at 11:16, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 08 Apr 2015, at 02:35, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >> Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>>> On 07 Apr 2015, at 04:51, Bruce Kellett wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I understand what you are claiming, but I do not agree with it. The >>>>> primary physical universe certainly exists, >>>>> >>>> Then computationalism is false. But what are your evidence for a >>>> *primary* physical universe. That is an axiom by Aristotle, and I believe >>>> animals are hard-wired to make some extrapolation here (for not doubting >>>> the prey and the predators), but there are no scientific evidence for a >>>> *primary* physical object. >>>> >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence for a universal dovetailer either. >>> >> >> We don't need evidence here. The existence of the universal dovetailer, >> and of all its finite pieces of executions is already a theorem of very >> elementary arithmetic. Those things exist in the same sense that prime >> number exist. >> > > Which is merely as thought patterns in the brains of physical beings. A large (and familiar on this list) metaphysical leap, which fails to explain how two cultures can discover the same maths, or indeed why maths "kicks back" at all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
