On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:19:02PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > >Exactly. Regardless of truth, it is an interesting model that could > >well inform us about the truth. Provided it is tractable, of course, > >which so far it has tended not to be (John Clark's criticism). > > No, the UD does not need to be tractable, because the first person > are not aware of the delays. > > John simply cannot understand this, because this needs step 3, 4, 5, > 6, 7. >
Sorry - you misunderstood me. In this case, I was referring to the consequences of the AUDA, ie the programme of extracting physics from COMP. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
