2015-05-27 19:36 GMT+02:00 John Clark <[email protected]>: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Citing Wolfram is a per-authority argument. That is not valid. >> > > But citing Bruno Marchal as an authority is valid?? If you say one thing > and Wolfram says another I'll put my money on Wolfram. Who wouldn't? > > http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/reference%20articles/The%20Turing-Church%20Thesis.html
> John K Clark > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy Batty/Rutger Hauer) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
