On 05 Jun 2015, at 21:03, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you agree that the simulated "john Clark" will still complain
that matter is missing in computation, despite we know that he
refers to number relations, without knowing it?
If the simulation had been done correctly then the simulated John
Clark will have the same opinions I do including reservations about
computations being made without matter. If the simulation was being
performed on a computer made of matter then the reservations were
justified, if the simulation was being performed by pure mathematics
and nothing else then they were not.
You need also the Pope to bless the matter, I think.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
