On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:


> ​> ​
> QM says that the brains will very quickly (microseconds) diverge.


​You pulled that microsecond figure straight out of the air. Nobody knows
exactly how long it would take for quantum indeterminacy to make 2 brains
diverge significantly more than, for example, taking a sip of coffee; but I
would bet money it would take many millions (if not billions) of
microseconds.   ​

 John K Clark









>
> On 10/6/2015 10:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> It's not clear to me who is arguing for what.  Stathis may think that
>>> consciousness is independent of it's physical substrate, but I don't see
>>> that he's arguing that here.  He's arguing that there can be more that one
>>> instance of "the same" consciousness.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, like for example when you are duplicated at W and M, but still in
>> the box, before opening the box. There are two instantiation of the same
>> consciousness. From the 1p view, the person can be consistently said to be
>> unique, at both place at once. Once she opens the door, she get the bit of
>> information which differentiate her from her doppelganger.
>>
>
> But this is inconsistent with QM.  Your view of conscious thoughts as
> instantiated by computation implicitly assumes deterministic, classical
> evolution of the brain, so that two identical brains with identical
> perceptual inputs will have identical thought sequences, in analogy to two
> computers running the same program.  As the computations are instantiated
> in arithmetic they are necessarily a unity, as there can be only a single
> number 2.  But QM says that the brains will very quickly (microseconds)
> diverge.  So if duplication were possible this could provide a test of your
> theory - do the duplicate's thoughts diverge even before the door is
> opened.  Of course duplication of brains or people is not possible - but
> duplication of computers is.  Computers are deliberately designed to act
> deterministically; we want them to instantiate arithmetic, not QM.  Yet
> they do instantiate QM and although they will not diverge quickly, they too
> will diverge.
>
> Brent
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to