On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:23:47PM -0800, Pierz wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 8:39:12 PM UTC+11, Russell Standish wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 08:55:09PM -0700, Pierz wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Anyway it seems that if we're committed to computationalism plus Church 
> > > thesis, then we have to consider the possibility that evolution may be a 
> > > conscious process - indeed the onus should be on us to say why it 
> > *wouldn't* be 
> > > conscious. 
> >
> > I don't think we know enough about consciousness to really say one way 
> > or the other, so no the onus is not on anyone. 
> >
> > "Onus" or not, computationalists should at least attempt to be consistent. 
> If genetic algorithms are considered potentially conscious, then it is 
> legitimate to ask why evolution itself would not be. One should examine all 
> the ramifications of a theory and not simply wave the uncomfortable ones 
> away by saying "we can't know." It's often in the pursuit of the 

To be fair, I never said "we can't know". What I said is "we don't
know". I think it premature to speculate whether biological evolution
implements a conscious program, in other words, maybe fun for pub
talk, but generally speaking a waste of time.

> implications of a theory to the last possible limit that things get 
> interesting - think Einstein pursuing the constancy of the speed of light 

Sure - but there are plenty of ways of doing this without falling over
into idle speculation. The notion that consciousness is an
evolutionary process does have some testable claims, for example.

> to its logical conclusion. It's also where the theory's flaws are likely to 
> be exposed. It seems to me though that computationalists are generally 
> mainly interested in explaining away the apparent mystery of the Hard 
> Problem of consciousness in the brain, rather than overturning the 
> conception of nature as an unconscious machine. But that *is* what it leads 
> to ISTM - at least the Putnamesque, functional type version of CTM.
> 

How so? It's not at all clear it has anything to say on these matters.
 

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to