On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:


>> ​>> ​
>> Many-Worlds gives the best explanation for why probabilities and not
>> certainties exist at the quantum level that I know of, and that and the
>> fact that it doesn't need to define "consciousness" or "observation" is why
>> I like it.
>
>
> ​> ​
> Everett still does need to explain observation,
>

​No he does not because Everett says observation is not what causes a
universe to split it's simply a change, a change made in anything will make
it happen and it doesn't matter if it's a observation or not.
For Everett the universe splits ​whenever there is a change in an observer
but it also
 also happens whenever there is a change in a non-observer. For Everett
observers obey the exact same laws of physics that non-observers do, but in
Copenhagen observers obey different laws, sort of like the ancient Greeks
who thought the ​physics on the Earth and the physics in the realm of the
stars were different. So unlike Everett Copenhagen needs to explain exactly
what a observation is and it has done a pretty poor job at doing that. Is
an ape good enough to make a observation and collapse the wave function,
what about a dog, or a cockroach, or a bacteria, or a virus? Copenhagen
needs to know what a observation is but doesn't. Everett doesn't know
either but he doesn't need to know.

​>> ​
>> ​But I don't reject "FPI" in ANYTHING! I've known since I was 2 that
>> sometimes a person doesn't know what is going to happen next.
>
>
> ​>​
> By a non intrinsic ignorance. But with self-duplication and/or
> self-superposition, the ignorance is intrinsic.
>

​It's exactly ​the same thing. If I receive stimuli from X I will be the
guy who received stimuli from X, if not I will be the guy who did not
receive stimuli from X.  Apparently you find this fact profound, I do not.


> ​> ​
> Even an omniscient God cannot predict the result of self-measurement in
> those cases.
>

Even an omniscient God cannot
​ make ​
the guy who received stimuli from X
​ ​t
he guy who
​ did not​
 receive stimuli from X
​. ​
Apparently you find this fact profound, I do not.

​  John K Clark​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to