In this land Telmo, the means to get voters to vote is achieved by cash. In the 
US this is what seems to work. The US is thus, essentially an oligarchy, 
specifically, a plutocracy. I am ignorant if the EU, or more directly, 
Scandinavia is this way as well? Money gets people to the polls, and both 
parties are owned by billionaires. The US media is owned by billionaires, and 
on the Dem party side, they are the same people. The voters for the Dems go to 
the polls, primarily for the financial benefits they receive, directly from the 
state. 

The Republican party is the same way, and is owned specifically, by the US 
Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundatble. This is where we are receiving 
class conflict in the US. It is, if we were to draw up sides, the very rich and 
the poor, and entitled, on one side; and the middle class on the other. The 
policies are all geared to benefit the clients of the very rich and the poor. 

You can look at the phrase "hedge fund managers," and get the idea on who is 
the Ruling Class. I view this nation-state as heading for violent conflict, but 
because there is no room for compromise there's zero to be done. A crucial 
issue that has emerged, is the survival of the current nation-states, via, 
imposed immigration. I am guessing that whatever your political views are, you 
are not thrilled with the social conflict and crime is, say, in Malmo? This is 
what I would conclude as the elites using people from Islam or, in the US case, 
Latin America, as a means of ensuring a solid voting block. If the elites 
cannot win by winning a nations' population over, they can then import 'voters' 
to replace the disaffected, local people. 

I, oversimplify this whole issue, but it breaks down to progressives will 
sacrifice their own countries, if they believe that they, personally, will not 
be adversely, affected by the policies of their political masters. One 
observation along this line is that "anti-war" protesters are never against 
wars involving Islamist aggression, or acts by China in the Pacific, or Mother 
Russia, but are ever, against the US military, the UK, etc.

In any case, may you have a Joyous, Newtomas Season (The season of reason?), 
though, I prefer a holiday that invokes Hugh Everett, or maybe a proponent of 
the holographic principle? 

Mitch





 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Nov 29, 2015 4:14 am
Subject: Re: Debate questions.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pji_IX-UacM



On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

          
    
    
    
On 11/28/2015 6:28 AM, spudboy100 via      Everything List wrote:
    
    
One could ask the Dems directly -
          Ms Clinton-What do accept money for the Clinton Foundation          
from the Saudi's $$$$?
        
    
    I dunno.  What do?
    
    
          Ms. Clinton - How much money do you accept from George Soros          
Foundation $$$$?
        
    
    However much he'd like to give.
    
    
          Ms. Clinton- George Soros, the funder of environmentalist          
causes just bought a chunk of Peabody Coal, why?
        
    
    Why don't you ask George?
    
    
          Ms. Clinton -Do you, as of right now, do you know of a storage        
  technology that can store Terawatts of Solar?
        
    
    Sure.
    
    
          Clinton-Benghazi, Clinton-Syria, Clinton-Economy,          
Clinton-Spying...
        
    
    Is this a new chant of Kurt Gowdy?  Makes more sense than his    questions.
    
    
          
          I could also apply this to the Bushes, but since you gace          
drawn the line....unguarde!
        
    
    But you don't because you like hereditary plutocracy?  Or because    JEB is 
so pitifully incompetent that even his PAC can't save him?
    
    
          
          Ok, Brent, I will leave you be, because for you, Texas must be        
  a sort of purgatory for you, yes? 
    
    Are you as confused about where I live as about everything else?
    
    
So yes, you are permitted to be sarcastic, via Slate.          On the other 
hand, I am feeling that the US will soon be a          failed state, as CIA 
used to term this.This, because there is          no reasonable resolution 
between us. 
    
    Are you intending to overthrow the democratic process and no longer    
abide by the result of elections.  What will you do, declare The    Donald your 
supreme leader and declare a yyyuuuuge victory?
    
    
I am seriously, not, a social, or even an economic          conservative. I am, 
for what it's worth, a nationalist        
    
    So you're in favor of nations not being invaded and controlled by    other 
nations.  You like the 1648 treaty of Westphalia.  Who    doesn't.
    
    
and your party and your team (Dems) are Not. Your lot          is 
anti-nationalist, worldwide, 
    
    What's that supposed to mean?  Democrats are interested in the world    
beyond our borders - probably so.  But they're not the team that    decided 
that regime change of the axis of evil would be a good    foreign policy.  
They're not the team that banished all the Sunni    Bathists from the Iraqi 
army.
    
    
with progressivism having a strong leaning          towards Stalinist 
practices...eventually. 
    
    And Nationalist like you and The Donald have fascist policies they    want 
to implement.
    
    
On immigration, if they (Democrats-Progressives)          start eroding the 
base of whites, older blacks, and          Latinos who have been here 
long-term, 
    
    Fact free Faux Gnus fantasy:     
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/21/lies-damned-lies-and-obamas-deportation-statistics/
      
    
    
The Bamers, and the Merkels, and the EU, want to          Import replacement 
Voters, in exchange for goodies          from the State. 
    
    Bullshit.  Immigrants don't get to vote until they become citizens.     In 
the U.S. that takes about 2yrs.  And they have to pass a test on    U.S. 
government and take an oath to support the Constitution and the    democratic 
process - so you wouldn't qualify
    
    
Thus, to ensure the Progressive Choke Hold on power,        
    
    Yeah it must be that Progressive Choke hold that prevents the GOP    from 
doing anything despite having a majority in both houses of    Congress.  If 
only they had the Presidency - then maybe they could    invade Syria, the 
Ukaraine, and Iran.
    
    
numerically. So its a play on your ideologies part,          and a failure on 
my ideologies part (I am genuinely a          pragmatist but want ourt 
nation-state to survive for a good          while). 
        
    
    Survive as a white male rich-man's        oligarchy.
    
    
    
          
          I feel (not think) that the US is due for a civil war, and          
what happens afterwards, is anyone's guess. 
    
    Well the cops are doing their best to incite a revolt among blacks.
    
    
Maybe a US continent looking something like the HBO          series, The Man in 
the High Castle (book written in 62) will          result? 
    
    Trump's already proposed making Muslims carry I.D. cards so he can    watch 
them better.
    
    
Perhaps, the best we can all hope for would be          territorially, a velvet 
divorce, like between the Czech and          Slovak Republic. You'd move out of 
Texas, and I'd move out of          Ohio. A traumatic vision in either case, 
and one I do not look          forward to.
        
    
    Why not move to Texas now.  They seem to have everything you want.     
Exaggerated self-worth, mythical history, persecution complex,    apocalyptic 
visions, contempt for diversity, guns, grits, and    greed.  
    
    
          
          Apologies, for this rant, but I felt that your Slate article          
needed a reposite. 
    
    I doubt you even read it.  It was quite funny.  But humor is rare in    
revolutionaries.
    
    Brent
    "Texas is my country, truth is my religion - and fuck 'em if they    can't 
take a joke."
        --- Kinky Friedman
    
    
I used 'effects' on this email to assist in your          reading of this 
epistle, so as to speed it all up, and lessen          your likely, disgust at 
my words. 
          
          Regards,  none the less, 
          
          Mitch
                
 
        
        
 
        
        
 
        
        
-----Original          Message-----
          From: Brent Meeker <[email protected]>
          To: EveryThing <[email protected]>
          Sent: Fri, Nov 27, 2015 10:16 pm
          Subject: Debate questions.
          
          Questions you wish they'd really asked at the Republican          
debate:
          
          
http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/11/16/hardball-questions-for-the-next-debate/
          
          Brent
        
      
    
  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to