On 12/27/2015 3:56 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:


On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 12/23/2015 1:12 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:


    On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:31 PM, John Clark <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On Wed, Dec 23, 2015  Telmo Menezes <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:

                    ​ >
                    ​ >>​
                    ​
                    and their land is not your land.


                ​
                ​ >> ​
                I do not have the same faith in the divine right of
                inherited wealth as you do.


            ​ > ​
            Nice dodge. Yes, let's put all in the same bag, Wall
            Street trust fund kids and remote tribes wanting to keep
            living their way in *the place they were born in*.


        ​
        I'm not a big fan of
        ​ ​
        Wall Street trust fund kids
        ​ ​
        either, and if one of them owned one of the 3 places on the
        planet where a thirty meter telescope could be built and
        refused to let it be used for that purpose I would be in
        favor of using the law of eminent domain to force the brat to
        sell it. And by the way, no native Hawaiian or anybody else
        was ever born atop Mauna Kea, there is nothing living up
        there except for a few astronomers, and if native Hawaiians
        ​ ​
        get there way soon there won't even be that, they want to
        remove all telescopes from the mountain including the world
        class ones that have been there for decades. Why do you
        defend these people?


    I don't defend them. I think they should not interfere with the
    construction of the telescope. All I am saying is that ramming
    things down people's throats isn't working out so well. I am
    suggesting that something like the "prime directive" is probably
    a good idea. It would be nice to put a telescope in a certain
    mountain, but it's not our mountain, so tough shit.

?? Why isn't it our mountain? The Hawaiians didn't create it. The ownership of land is a concept invented and enforced by the
    U.S. and Hawaiian state government.  There's no ownership of land
    apart from the society that enforces it.  In this case the state
    of Hawaii owns the land and they approved the use of the land for
    astronomy.


This is the usual confusion between lawful and ethical.
The desire and need to have some control over one's environment already existed in biological species much more ancient than the Homo Sapeins.

But among social animals it was joint ownership...which is exactly the kind of ownership the government exercises over. The Hawaiians are like a small fraction of the tribe who wants to have exclusive control of a part of the joint territory because they have supernatural myths they tell about it.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to