John, are you serious about that statement? I am betting the Greeks could have knocked it out of the way in one minute.
Today a bright 4th grader could multiply two 5 digit numbers together in about 1 0 minutes , but it would have taken the smartest ancient Greek a lifetime to do so (and even then would have probably made a mistake and gotten the wrong answer) , and that same Greek would get a F on a 4th grade science test. The idea that somebody like that could help those in the 21th century working on cutting edge problems in physics and mathematics is ridiculous. On the other hand equations had to wait for the Hindus, which the Arabs used for their own, and we all had to wait for Newton, and Liebniz to develop calculus. I will leave Diophantine number to Bruno, because I am clueless about them, but like the term,Diophantine. Or Piano arithmetic, or La Place numbers, monads, or other indiscerbables, including Liebniz, again. Just for a backup to cryogenics or obliteration, John, try this guy out for size, you may, perhaps, like him? He was a software engineer before becoming a dr. of philosophy. Let me know your opinion, ok? Steinhart is a huge math brain, like Bruno, and likes to relax by doing math stuff-wish I could. http://ericsteinhart.com/articles/natlife.pdf http://ericsteinhart.com/articles/digitalism.pdf http://ericsteinhart.com/articles/dawkinstheogony.pdf http://ericsteinhart.com/articles/dawkinstheogony.pdf -----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 4:29 pm Subject: Re: Cryonics punched cards and the brain On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't mind a bit about the ancestor worship thing. I mind , during the middle ages and well into the renaissance Greek ancestor worship was a hindrance to progress. Whenever somebody came up with a new original idea the response was always the same : that can't be right because it contradicts what the ancient Greeks thought. Today a bright 4th grader could multiply two 5 digit numbers together in about 1 0 minutes , but it would have taken the smartest ancient Greek a lifetime to do so (and even then would have probably made a mistake and gotten the wrong answer) , and that same Greek would get a F on a 4th grade science test. The idea that somebody like that could help those in the 21th century working on cutting edge problems in physics and mathematics is ridiculous. > I admit now to having real difficulty following Bruno's mathematical theology, You're not alone, I don't think anybody on this list understands Bruno's ideas, and that includes Bruno. > which is not his fault, but instead my inability to comprehend his math. The problem isn't that Bruno's mathematics is too sophisticated, it's that his logic is too silly and the fact that the very thing you're thing you're trying to prove can't be uses as an assumption in a proof. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
